I'm not going to point out the exact article I'm referring to: it's disturbing enough without showing you directly.
But, the reason today's article in the New York Times is important is, well, if you compare the article with my books, you'll see a similarity, a certain message being sent about my writing, or maybe about me or in relation to me.
It's nice to know someone is watching me ---- but it's very sad because of the disturbing nature of the subject matter and content.
Basically, maybe I should be keeping things "Topsy Kretts", but I'm just some guy, and well, to validate my sanity about these things, I have to be able to talk about it.
Anyway, there is some deeply disturbing history and messages in the The New York article when compared with my writings, and I apologize for the disaster.
Of course, at face value, I really have no idea what the actual event being discussed in the article was - I have no idea where it came from or why that guy did what he did. All I know is I see a connection between certain words in the article and my own life and writing.
And I apologize. I could even make excuses, but I don't want to reveal too much information. Just read my book and you'll see my excuse.